|
Bearing in mind that an evaluation ought to provide information in a timely manner, so that it becomes available when the programme or project needs it most, Project Managers should determine a schedule for when to carry out a mid-term or final Independent Project Evaluation in order to plan well in advance
|
1. Planning for an Independent Project Evaluation
Project Managers take into account:
-
|
The time needed for the Project Manager to
draft the evaluation ToR; |
-
|
The time needed for IEU to
review the ToR; |
-
|
The time needed to identify, interview and contract external international and national evaluators. |
|
Time needed for the evaluation team to conduct the desk review and to work out the sampling strategy and overall evaluation methodology
|
-
|
Travel days and national holidays; |
-
|
The time needed for
data analysis and preparation of the
draft report; |
-
|
The time needed for stakeholders (including IEU) to
comment on the draft report; |
| - |
The time needed for evaluators to
accommodate those comments; |
| - |
The time needed for IEU to
clear the final report. |
2. Considering the Independent Project Evaluation Process
In other words, when scheduling an evaluation, Project Managers consider the time needed to complete each steps of the evaluation process.
|
Steps in an Evaluation
I.
|
Background data collection |
II.
|
Evaluation ToR |
III.
|
Logistics |
IV.
|
Recruitment of the evaluation team |
V.
|
Desk review |
VI.
|
Evaluation team briefing and possible interviews at UNODC HQ |
VII.
|
Inception report |
VIII.
|
In-country evaluation mission(s) (visits to the field, briefings, interviews etc.) |
IX.
|
Data analysis |
X.
|
Draft evaluation report |
XI.
|
Quality assurance of the draft evaluation report: factual verification and collection of comments |
XII.
|
Inclusion of comments received |
XIII.
|
Final evaluation report |
XIV.
|
Final presentation of findings, e.g. at UNODC Headquarters and/or in the field |
|
Indicative Duration of an Independent Project Evaluation Process:
|
Evaluation Steps
|
Responsible Person
|
Tentative working Days
|
| Background data collection |
PM |
10 days |
| Evaluation ToR |
PM |
10 days |
| Logistics |
PM/IEU |
5 days |
| Recruitment of the evaluation team |
PM/IEU |
10 days |
| Desk review |
Evaluation team |
5 days |
| Evaluation team briefing and possible interviews at UNODC HQ |
PM/ Evaluation team |
2 days |
| Inception report |
Evaluation team/ IEU |
2 days |
| Field mission, including briefings from Ministries and interviews |
Evaluation team |
7 days |
| Data analysis |
Evaluation team |
7 days |
| Presentation of evaluation findings with key stakeholders |
Evaluation team |
0,5 day |
| Draft evaluation report |
Evaluation team/IEU |
15 days |
| Factual verification and collection of comments |
PM |
7 days |
| Inclusion of comments received |
Evaluation team |
3 days |
| Final evaluation report |
Evaluation team/ IEU |
7 days |
| Final presentation of findings at HQ |
Evaluation team |
1 day |
|
TOTAL
|
|
91,5 days
|
Timing for In-depth Evaluations takes significantly longer.
|
3. Developing a Timetable for an Independent Project Evaluation
A detailed timetable with breakdown of days worked by consultants against their tasks and deliverables should be included by Project Managers in the ToR of the evaluation.
For further information on the evaluation ToR please see Chapter III, Section C.
Example
Please find hereafter a timetable with an approximate breakdown of days worked for an international and a national evaluator. Please note that the below working days are not prescriptive and vary depending on the project size and travel time required.
|
|
International Consultant Timetable
|
|
Duties
|
Duration
(working days)
|
Location
|
Results
|
| Desk review |
5 days |
Home based |
List of evaluation questions developed
Evaluation tools developed Draft inception report |
| Briefing and interviews with staff at UNODC HQ. |
2 days |
UNODC HQ |
Inception report |
| Evaluation mission: briefing, interviews etc. |
7 days |
Cities/Countries |
Notes |
| Presentation of findings at UNODC HQ |
2 days |
UNODC HQ |
Notes |
| Drafting of the evaluation report based on UNODC template; submission to stakeholders for comments; and finalization of report |
14 days |
Home base |
Draft report Final Report |
|
Total
|
30 days
|
|
|
|
National Consultant Timetable
|
|
Duties
|
Duration
(working days)
|
Location
|
Results
|
| Desk review and collection of additional information as required |
5 days
|
Home base |
List of evaluation questions
Evaluation tools developed Draft inception report |
| Establishment of the mission's programme; Interview guidelines in collaboration with the international consultant |
| Evaluation mission: briefing and interviews |
5 days |
Cities/Countries |
Notes |
| Drafting of chapters of the evaluation report in collaboration with the international consultant |
5 days |
Home base |
Draft chapters of the report |
|
Total
|
15 days
|
|
|
_________________________________________________________
|
|
|