Evaluation in the Project/Programme Cycle
Evaluation is often seen as an "end of project cycle" exercise. Evaluation, however, plays a distinct role at all stages of the project cycle.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPATORY SELF-EVALUATIONS:
In line with the Special Message of 31 July 2014 ( please click here), the participatory self-evaluation modality will no longer be an option for projects at UNODC.
Evaluation is part of the project cycle and is planned for at the design stage for all UNODC projects and programmes.
Findings of evaluation reports is a precious input into the decision-making and planning processes. Evaluation enables continuous improvement and learning through implementation of recommendations, understanding and incorporation of lessons learned from past evaluations into new strategies, programmes and projects.
The planning begins with the identification of ideas in consultation with stakeholders. The Project Manager and relevant Offices and Units then formulate the project/programme document. The Project Manager is further responsible for consulting already existing Evaluation Plans to ensure coordination with evaluations that may take place at the same time or in the same geographical or thematic areas.
When preparing or revising a project or programme document, IEU needs to be consulted prior to submitting any document for clearance in ProFi.
The following evaluation criteria need to be included in the paragraph on evaluation:
1.1) Mid-term and/or final evaluation;
1.2) Independent Project Evaluation or In-Depth Evaluation;
1.3) Rationale for this choice.
mid-term evaluation is formative in nature and typically used to assess achievements half-way through the project or programme and to derive lessons for implementation.
Further information (please click): Evaluation Criteria
2.1) Purpose (e.g. utilization of evaluation findings, capture innovative dimensions, plan for future project phase, present findings at a specific event etc.)
Further information (please click): Evaluation Handbook, Chapter 2c
3.1) Year of the evaluation;
3.2) Time plan for evaluation preparation and implementation;
3.3) Indicate whether, in the case of a project extension, initially planned evaluations are rescheduled.
Recommended time plan: In-Depth Evaluations (IDE): 10-12 months, Independent Project Evaluations (IPE): 6 months.
Please note that a final evaluation needs to be undertaken before completion of each project or programme.
For all projects or programmes with a duration of more than four years, a mid-term, as well as a final evaluation is required.
Further information (please click): Evaluation Handbook
4.1) Year, type and main evaluation findings and recommendations of prior evaluations, if any.
5.1) Amount reserved for evaluation (in the budget table under budget line 5700 as well within the evaluation paragraph).
The recommended minimum amount to be reserved for an evaluation is 2-3% of the overall budget. Furthermore, for projects with a proposed budget above USD 1,000,000 a minimum of two evaluator need to be contracted.
6.1) Roles and responsibilities of the Project Manager, the main stakeholders and IEU in the evaluation process (in line with the matrixes on Evaluation Roles and Responsibilities).
Further information (please click): Evaluation Step-by-Step
Evaluation reports, through evidence based findings and thorough analysis, allow UNODC to show Donors and Member States the work that has been achieved, the positive outcomes of UNODC's engagement as well as the gaps that remain to be filled.
Mid-term evaluations also provide important findings and recommendations which point out the positive and the negative aspects of the work being conducted. By undertaking an evaluation and by following its recommendations, an Organization can ensure success and prevent easily avoidable mistakes from happening. This allows UNODC to reach its goals and achieve planned outcomes as set in its strategies.