Base de datos de jurisprudencia

Trata de personas

United States v. Theresa Mubang

Resumen de los hechos

The defendant Mubang, a naturalized US citizen, originally from Cameroon, kept a minor girl from Cameroon in involuntary servitude for approximately 2 years. The defendant took the girl from her parents in Cameroon, promising them that the girl, E.C., would receive an American education, and would lead a better life than in Cameroon. She then transported the girl through London using a false passport for E.C.. Once at the defendant's home in Greenbelt, Maryland, E.C. was forced to serve as a nanny to the defendant's sons, was required to cook and clean, and was isolated from the Maryland community, and never allowed to speak with her family back in Cameroon. E.C. slept on the floor and cared for the children around-the-clock. Mubang prohibited her from opening the door of the house, or from leaving the house for any reason other than the completion of specific household tasks. E.C. was never sent to school or allowed to communicate with children her age. Mubang subjected E.C. to continued verbal and physical abuse, often beating her with belts and high-heel-shoes to the extent that the girl would start bleeding, or the girl's skull would ooze fluids from the hits with the high-heel shoe. E.C. escaped from the house while Mubang was at a weekend conference. Notably, about a year prior to E.C.'s enslavement, the defendant had similarly enslaved another young girl from Cameroon. However, she had sent her back to Cameroon, because the girl had started calling the police.  Additionally, after E.C. escaped, Mubang brought over another girl from Cameroon, enslaving her as well. That victim managed to escape as well.

Mubang fled the United States after she was convicted before sentencing took place. She was sentenced to 17.5 years in prison in absentia. In May, 2005, she was caught in Cameroon and sent back to the United States to serve her sentence.

Fecha de la Sentencia:
2005-02-28
Autor:
Human Trafficking Database of the University of Michigan Law School

Palabras clave

Trafficking in Persons Protocol:
Artículo 5, Protocolo contra la la trata de personas
Hechos:
Reclutamiento
Transporte
Acogida
Medio:
Amenaza o al uso de la fuerza u otras formas de coacción
Abuso de poder o de una situación de vulnerabilidad
Fines de explotación:
Trabajos o servicios forzados
Servidumbre

Cuestiones transversales

Consideraciones de igualdad de género

Detalles

• Mujeres como infractoras principales

Información sobre el procedimiento

Sistema jurídico:
Derecho anglosajón
Última sentencia judicial:
Tribunal de primera instancia
Tipo de Proceso:
Penal
 

Víctima / Demandantes de primera instancia

Víctima:
E.C.
Sexo:
Niño
Nacionalidad:
camerunés
Víctima:
2 additional anonymous
Sexo:
Niño
Nacionalidad:
camerunés

Acusado / Demandado de primera instancia

Acusado:
Theresa Mubang
Sexo:
Mujer
Razonamiento jurídico:

On February 28, 2005, Mubang was sentenced in absentia to concurrent terms of 210 months of imprisonment (on count one), and 120 months of imprisonment (on count two), along with three years of supervised release.

Cargos/Acusaciones/Decisiones

Acusado:
Theresa Mubang
Legislación/Código:
18 U.S.C. 1584
Detalles de cargos:
Involuntary servitude
Veredicto:
Guilty
Detalles de cargos:
Harboring an illegal alien for financial gain
Veredicto:
Guilty
Pena de prisión:
17 años 6 Meses
With an additional 3 years of supervised release
Indemnización/Pago a la víctima:
Sí  100000  USD  (50,000-100,000 USD)
Restitution
Multa/Pago al Estado:
Sí  200  USD  (Up to 10,000 USD) Special assessment
Fallo del tribunal de apelación:

Mubang’s counsel filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit two days after the judgment against Mubang had been entered. In April 2005, the fourth circuit denied the motion to stay, and dismissed the appeal, but granted Mubang leave to file an appeal, as long as Mubang surrendered herself to federal custody within 30 days. Mubang did not do so. On November 21, 2005, the fourth circuit denied the defendant’s motion to reinstate the case.

Tribunal

United States District Court for the District of Maryland