Base de datos de jurisprudencia

Trata de personas

United States v. Timothy Bradley, Criminal Case No. 03-CR-61

Resumen de los hechos

During the period from 1999 to September 2001, the defendants Bradley and O’Dell, lured a total of 5 seasonal workers from Jamaica to work at the defendants’ tree removal company in New Hampshire. On two separate occasions, the defendants traveled to Jamaica to recruit workers. The men who agreed to come to the United States were promised wages of between 10-20 USD per hour and lodging on the defendants’ property.

Once in the United States, victims were paid less than the promised wage, and were housed in substandard conditions. For example, the first two workers (L.W. & G.C.), were forced to live in a camping trailer that initially lacked basic necessities such as running water and heat. To maintain control over the victims, the defendants subjected the workers to verbal assaults, threats, and physical abuse. The defendants also confiscated victims’ identity documents and plane tickets. When L.W. fled to New York, Bradley, in the presence of the remaining workers, threatened to travel to New York with his gun to track down the runaway. After the defendants recruited a second group of workers (M.S., A.F., and D.H.), to New Hampshire, O’Dell told the three men that Bradley planned to hire someone in Jamaica to “destroy” the victim who fled to New York. The defendants also impeded the victims’ access to medical care, and closely monitored their movements outside of the defendants’ property.

Eventually, several workers fled the property and contacted local law enforcement.

Autor:
Human Trafficking Database of the University of Michigan Law School

Palabras clave

Trafficking in Persons Protocol:
Artículo 3, Protocolo contra la la trata de personas
Artículo 5, Protocolo contra la la trata de personas
Hechos:
Reclutamiento
Transporte
Acogida
Medio:
Amenaza o al uso de la fuerza u otras formas de coacción
Fraude
Engaño
Abuso de poder o de una situación de vulnerabilidad
Fines de explotación:
Trabajos o servicios forzados
Forma de la Trata:
Transnacional
Sector en el que la explotación se lleva a cabo:
Agricultura

Cuestiones transversales

Consideraciones de igualdad de género

Detalles

• Mujeres como infractoras principales

Información sobre el procedimiento

Sistema jurídico:
Derecho anglosajón
Última sentencia judicial:
Tribunal de primera instancia
Tipo de Proceso:
Penal
 

Víctima / Demandantes de primera instancia

Víctima:
L.W.
Sexo:
Hombre
Nacionalidad:
jamaiquino
Víctima:
G.C.
Sexo:
Hombre
Nacionalidad:
jamaiquino
Víctima:
M.S.
Sexo:
Hombre
Nacionalidad:
jamaiquino
Víctima:
A.F.
Sexo:
Hombre
Nacionalidad:
jamaiquino
Víctima:
D.H.
Sexo:
Hombre
Nacionalidad:
jamaiquino

Acusado / Demandado de primera instancia

Acusado:
Timothy H. Bradley
Sexo:
Hombre
Edad:
43
Acusado:
Kathleen Mary O’Dell
Sexo:
Mujer
Edad:
48
Razonamiento jurídico:

A federal jury convicted the defendants on a number of counts related to the forced labor scheme. In January 2004, Bradley and O’Dell were each sentenced to 70 months imprisonment and ordered to pay 13,052 USD in restitution.

Cargos/Acusaciones/Decisiones

Acusado:
Timothy H. Bradley
Acusado:
Kathleen Mary O’Dell
Legislación/Código:
18 U.S.C. Art.371
Detalles de cargos:
Conspiracy to commit forced labor
Veredicto:
Guilty
Detalles de cargos:
Forced labor
Veredicto:
Guilty
Detalles de cargos:
Trafficking into forced labor
Veredicto:
Guilty
Detalles de cargos:
Document servitude
Veredicto:
Guilty
Detalles de cargos:
Wire fraud
Veredicto:
Guilty
Pena de prisión:
5 años 10 Meses
Indemnización/Pago a la víctima:
Sí  13052  USD  (10,000-50,000 USD)
In restitution to victims
Fallo del tribunal de apelación:
Remanded

2nd Instance: Bradley and O’Dell contested both of their convictions and their sentences. In particular, they challenged a number of alleged errors in the district court's jury instructions; the introduction of evidence regarding their treatment of L.W. and G.C. in 1999-2000; and the application of two sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2H4.1. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court. [390 F.3d 145 (2004)]

3rd Instance: The Court of Appeals was ordered to remand this case in light of Booker case. The Court of Appeals vacated the defendants’ sentences, and remanded the case for more proceedings to address possible mitigating circumstances that might have reduced their sentences. [545 U.S. 1101 (2005); 426 F.3d 54 (2005)].

On remand in 2006, the district court declined to alter the sentences.

Tribunal

United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire