Судебная базы данных

Торговля людьми

United States v. Timothy Bradley, Criminal Case No. 03-CR-61

Краткое изложение обстоятельств дела

During the period from 1999 to September 2001, the defendants Bradley and O’Dell, lured a total of 5 seasonal workers from Jamaica to work at the defendants’ tree removal company in New Hampshire. On two separate occasions, the defendants traveled to Jamaica to recruit workers. The men who agreed to come to the United States were promised wages of between 10-20 USD per hour and lodging on the defendants’ property.

Once in the United States, victims were paid less than the promised wage, and were housed in substandard conditions. For example, the first two workers (L.W. & G.C.), were forced to live in a camping trailer that initially lacked basic necessities such as running water and heat. To maintain control over the victims, the defendants subjected the workers to verbal assaults, threats, and physical abuse. The defendants also confiscated victims’ identity documents and plane tickets. When L.W. fled to New York, Bradley, in the presence of the remaining workers, threatened to travel to New York with his gun to track down the runaway. After the defendants recruited a second group of workers (M.S., A.F., and D.H.), to New Hampshire, O’Dell told the three men that Bradley planned to hire someone in Jamaica to “destroy” the victim who fled to New York. The defendants also impeded the victims’ access to medical care, and closely monitored their movements outside of the defendants’ property.

Eventually, several workers fled the property and contacted local law enforcement.

Автор:
Human Trafficking Database of the University of Michigan Law School

Ключевые слова

Протокол о торговле людьми:
Статья 3 Протокола о торговле людьми
Статья 5 Протокола о торговле людьми
Действия:
Вербовка
Перевозка
Укрывательство
Средства:
Угроза применения или применение силы или иных форм принуждения
Мошенничество
Обман
Злоупотребление властью или уязвимостью положения
Цель эксплуатации:
Принудительный труд или услуги
Форма торговли:
Транснациональная
Сектор, в котором осуществляется экслуатация:
Сельское хозяйство

Комплексные вопросы

Вопросы гендерного равенства

Подробности

• Женщина — исполнитель преступления

Информация процедурного характера

Правовая система:
Общее право
Последнее решение суда:
Суд первой инстанции
Вид разбирательства:
Уголовный
 

Потерпевшие / Истцы в первой инстанции

Потерпевший:
L.W.
Пол:
Лицо мужского пола
Гражданство:
Потерпевший:
G.C.
Пол:
Лицо мужского пола
Гражданство:
Потерпевший:
M.S.
Пол:
Лицо мужского пола
Гражданство:
Потерпевший:
A.F.
Пол:
Лицо мужского пола
Гражданство:
Потерпевший:
D.H.
Пол:
Лицо мужского пола
Гражданство:

Обвиняемые/ответчики

Обвиняемый:
Timothy H. Bradley
Пол:
Лицо мужского пола
Возраст:
43
Обвиняемый:
Kathleen Mary O’Dell
Пол:
Лицо женского пола
Возраст:
48
Правовые основания:

A federal jury convicted the defendants on a number of counts related to the forced labor scheme. In January 2004, Bradley and O’Dell were each sentenced to 70 months imprisonment and ordered to pay 13,052 USD in restitution.

Обвинения / Иски / Решения

Обвиняемый:
Timothy H. Bradley
Обвиняемый:
Kathleen Mary O’Dell
Законодательство/статус/код:
18 U.S.C. Art.371
Подробная информация о пунктах обвинения:
Conspiracy to commit forced labor
Приговор:
Guilty
Подробная информация о пунктах обвинения:
Forced labor
Приговор:
Guilty
Подробная информация о пунктах обвинения:
Trafficking into forced labor
Приговор:
Guilty
Подробная информация о пунктах обвинения:
Document servitude
Приговор:
Guilty
Подробная информация о пунктах обвинения:
Wire fraud
Приговор:
Guilty
Срок лишения свободы:
5 лет 10 Месяцы
Компенсация / Выплата потерпевшим:
Да  13052  USD  (10,000-50,000 USD)
In restitution to victims
Решение апелляционного суда:
Remanded

2nd Instance: Bradley and O’Dell contested both of their convictions and their sentences. In particular, they challenged a number of alleged errors in the district court's jury instructions; the introduction of evidence regarding their treatment of L.W. and G.C. in 1999-2000; and the application of two sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2H4.1. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court. [390 F.3d 145 (2004)]

3rd Instance: The Court of Appeals was ordered to remand this case in light of Booker case. The Court of Appeals vacated the defendants’ sentences, and remanded the case for more proceedings to address possible mitigating circumstances that might have reduced their sentences. [545 U.S. 1101 (2005); 426 F.3d 54 (2005)].

On remand in 2006, the district court declined to alter the sentences.

Суд

United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire