Full title in original language:
Demythologizing Restorative Justice: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts in Context
Education level:
University University (18+ years)Topic / subtopic:
Crime prevention and criminal justice Restorative justice Criminal justice systemTarget audience:
Students,
Teachers / Lecturers
Type of resource:
Publication / Article
Languages:
English
Region of relevance:
Global
Access:
open access
Individual authors:
Olivia Lin
Publication year:
2005
Published by:
ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law
Copyright holder:
© ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law
Contact name and address:
ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law
Contact email:
nsuworks@nova.edu
Key themes:
cpcj, criminal justice, justice, crime, restorative justice
Links:
Short description:
This article seeks to penetrate past pure ideology to ask whether, in fact, South Africa's story is a wholly successful one, and to question the merit of its development into an international metanarrative. Through a more critical lens with which to view the TRC and truth commissions in general, it becomes possible to properly review the situation of other nations, such as Rwanda, who are attempting to borrow pages from South Africa's now-universalized narrative. Truth commissions may be the cinderella of international law's transitional justice models, but demythologizing the responses to civil conflict and ethnic unrest in Africa requires a look at the political realities that informed each country's choice to move toward restorative or punitive justice.