• عربي
  • 中文
  • English
  • Français
  • Português
  • Русский
  • Español
 
  This module is a resource for lecturers  

 

References

 
  • Allen, Amy (2016). Feminist Perspectives on Power. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall), Edward N. Zalta, ed. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab.
  • Armantier, Olivier, and Amadou Boly (2011). A controlled field experiment on corruption . European Economic Review,vol. 55, issue 8 (April), pp. 1072-1082.
  • Barnes, Tiffany, and Emily Beaulieu (2014). Gender stereotypes and corruption: how candidates affect perception of election fraud. Politics & Gender, vol. 10 (September), pp. 365-391.
  • Bauhr, Monika, Nicholas Charron and Lena Wängnerud (2018). Exclusion or interests? Why females in elected office reduce petty and grand corruption. European Journal of Political Research (July), pp. 1-23.
  • Bennett, Sarah, David P. Farrington and Rowell, L. Huesmann (2005). Explaining gender differences in crime and violence: The importance of social and cognitive skills. Aggression and Violent Behaviours, vol. 10, issue 3, (March-April), pp. 263-288.
  • Boehm, Frédéric (2015). Are men and women equally corrupt?. U4 Brief, no. 6 (May). Bergen, Norway: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
  • Boehm Frédéric, and Erika Sierra (2015). The gendered impact of corruption: Who suffers more - men or women? U4 Brief, no. 9 (August). Bergen, Norway: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
  • Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Global Judicial Integrity Network (2020 ) Issue Paper on Gender-Related Judicial Integrity Issues. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, issue 6 (July), pp. 1241-1299.
  • Croson, Rachel, and Uri Gneezy (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 47, issue 2 (June), pp. 448-474.
  • Debski, Julia, and others (2018). Gender and corruption: the neglected role of culture. European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 55 (December), pp. 526-537.
  • Diehl, Amy B. and Leanne M. Dzubinski (2018). The problem of gender essentialism and its implications for women in leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 12, no. 1 (June), pp. 56-61.
  • Dollar, David, Raymond Fisman, and Roberta Gatti (1999). Are Women Really the 'Fairer' Sex? Corruption and Women in Government. The PPR on Gender and Development Working Paper Series, No. 4. Washington, DC: The World Bank: Development Research Group.
  • Duflo, Esther, and Pascaline Dupas, and Michael Kremer (2015). School Governance, Teacher Incentives, and Pupil - Teacher Ratios: Experimental Evidence from Kenyan Primary Schools. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 123 (March), pp. 92-110.
  • Eagly, Alice H., and others (2003). Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 129, no. 4 (August), pp. 569-591.
  • Eggers, Andrew, Nick Vivyan, and Markus Wagner (2018). Corruption, accountability and gender: do female politicians face higher standards in public life? The Journal of Politics, vol. 80, no. 1 (October), pp. 321-326.
  • Esarey, Justin, and Gina Chirillo (2013). "Fairer sex" or purity myth? Corruption, gender and institutional context . Politics and Gender, vol. 9, issue 4 (December), pp. 361-389.
  • Esarey, Justin, and Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer (2018). Women's representation, accountability, and corruption in democracies. British Journal of Political Science, vol. 48, issue 3 (July), pp. 659-690.
  • Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press.
  • Goetz, Anne Marie, and Rob Jenkins (2005). Reinventing Accountability: Making Democracy Work for Human Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gottfredson, Michael R., and Travis Hirschi (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Gouws, A., and H. Kotze (2007). Women in Leadership Positions in South Africa: The Role of Values. Politikon, vol. 34, no. 2 (August), pp. 165-185.
  • Hossain, Naomi, Jessica J. Hughes, and Celestine Nyamu Musembi (2010). Corruption Accountability and Gender: Understanding the Connections. Primers in Gender and Democratic Governance. UNDP and UNIFEM.
  • Howson, Cynthia (2012). Women smuggling and the men who help them: gender, corruption and illicit networks in Senegal. Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 50, no. 3 (September), pp. 421-445.
  • Jha, Chandan Kumar, and Sudipta Sarangi (2018). Women and corruption: What positions must they hold to make a difference? Journal of Economic Behavior, and Organization, vol. 151 (July), pp. 219-233.
  • Johnson, Janet E., Þorgerður Einarsdóttir, and Gyða M. Pétursdóttir (2013). A Feminist Theory of Corruption: Lessons from Iceland. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lambsdorff, Johann G., and Björn Frank (2011). Corrupt Reciprocity - Experimental Evidence on a Men's Game. International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 31, Issue 2 (June), pp. 116-125.
  • Kubbe, Ina, and Engelbert, Annika, eds. (2018). Corruption and Norms. Why Informal Rules Matter. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lindberg, Helen, and Helena Stensöta (2018). Corruption as Exploitation: Feminist Exchange Theories and the Link Between Gender and Corruption. In Gender and Corruption: Historical Roots and New Avenues for Research, Stensöta Helena and Lena Wängnerud, eds. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Maras, Marie-Helen (2015). Unprotected Speech Communicated via Social Media: What Amounts to a True Threat? Journal of Internet Law, Vol. 19(3), 3-9.
  • Merkle, Ortrun (2018) . Mainstreaming Gender and Human Rights in Anti-corruption Programming. U4 Helpdesk Answer no. 8. Bergen, Norway: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
  • Paweenawat, Sasiwimon W. (2018). The gender-corruption nexus in Asia. Cranberra, Australia: Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
  • Raab, Michaela (2017). Gender-Responsive Work on Land and Corruption- A practical guide. Transparency International.
  • Rheinbay, Janna, and Mare Chêne (2016). Gender and Corruption Topic Guide: Complies by the Anti-Corruption Helpdesk. Transparency International.
  • Rivas, M. Fernanda (2013). An experiment on corruption and gender. Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 65, issue 1 (January), pp. 10-42.
  • Schulze, Günther G., and Björn Frank (2003). Deterrence versus intrinsic motivation: Experimental evidence on the determinants of corruptibility. Economics of Governance, vol. 4, no. 2 (January), pp. 143-160.
  • Sim, Bérengère, and others (2017). Gender and Corruption: A Toolkit to Address the 'Add Women and Stir' Myth. Paper presented at the 2017 OECD Global Anti-Corruption and Integrity Forum. Paris, March.
  • Stensöta, Helena, Richard Svensson, and Lena Wängnerud (2015). Gender and Corruption: the mediating power of institutional logics. Governance: An international Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, vol. 28, no. 4 (September), pp. 475-496.
  • Stensöta, Helena, and Lena Wängnerud (2018). Why expect a link between gender and corruption? In Gender and Corruption: Historical Roots and New Avenues for Research, Stensöta Helena and Lena Wängnerud, eds.Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Stockemer, Daniel (2018). Gender equality and electoral corruption: some insights from the local elections in Macedonia. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 26, issues 2-3 (October), pp. 267-275.
  • Sundström, Aksel, and Lena Wängnerud (2014). Corruption as an obstacle to women's political representation: Evidence from local councils in 18 European countries. Party Politics, vol. 22, issue 3 (September), pp. 354-369.
  • Sung, Hung-En (2003). Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited. Social Forces, vol. 82, issue 2 (December), pp. 703-723.
  • Swamy, Anand, and others (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, vol, 64, issue 1 (February), pp. 25-55. An earlier and open-source version of this study is available here.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2018). Human Development Indices and Indicators. Statistical Update. New York.
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2017). Trafficking in persons from Cambodia, Lao PDR and Myanmar to Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand.
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2018). Addressing the interplay between gender and corruption.
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the UNODC-INEGI Center of Excellence in Statistical Information on Government, Crime, Victimization and Justice (2018), Manual on Corruption Surveys: Methodological guidelines on the measurement of bribery and other forms of corruption through sample surveys . Vienna.
  • Wittgenstein, L., ed. (2001). Philosophical Investigations: The German Text With a Revised English Translation 3rd. Oxford: Blackwell.

 

Next: Exercises
Back to top